AdvertiseDonate
HonoluluSan FranciscoOaklandSan JoseStocktonSacramentoFresnoBakersfield
Wednesday, November 4, 2026Your daily read on the news.
Headlines Post · 4819 Kilauea Avenue, Honolulu, HI 96816
Politics · Anchorage

FBI Interviews Donors in Alaska Decoy Campaign Probe

Federal agents questioned twelve contributors to a local teacher's campaign after the Justice Department weighed charges over a tactic that split the Republican primary.

By Gabriel Qureshi ·

Illustration for: FBI Interviews Donors in Alaska Decoy Campaign Probe
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Federal agents visited the homes of twelve donors in Petersburg, Alaska, this week to question them about contributions made to Dan J. Sullivan, a local teacher who ran against incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan. The interviews follow a monthslong criminal investigation into allegations that Democratic operatives recruited a decoy candidate to draw votes away from the incumbent. The Justice Department is currently weighing criminal charges related to campaign finance violations, though specific statutes under consideration have not been publicly identified.

The two men share a name and a state but occupy very different political roles. Dan S. Sullivan, the Republican incumbent, faces a competitive challenge from Democrat Mary Peltola, a former U.S. representative. Dan J. Sullivan, a former elementary school teacher in the fishing town of Petersburg, entered the primary ballot in June. His campaign raised $7,150 from local supporters who said they knew exactly who they were backing. The tactic of running a decoy candidate is not new in Alaska politics, where open primaries and ranked choice voting systems often influence strategic decision-making.

The investigation has intensified scrutiny on a race that could determine control of the U.S. Senate. Peltola has denied any involvement in recruiting the local candidate. She told supporters in Anchorage last week that the state does not typically engage in such maneuvers. The former congresswoman distanced herself from a New York Times report linking a group supporting her to a Democratic operative who sought to recruit decoy candidates. She stated, "This is Alaska. We're not in the business of tricking each other up here."

Legal battles accompanied the candidacy from the start. The Alaska Division of Elections initially tried to remove Dan J. Sullivan from the ballot, arguing he did not file as a Republican in good faith. State courts later upheld his eligibility, ruling that no good-faith requirement exists in state law or the Constitution. A federal lawsuit brought by the Trump administration to revive efforts to block his candidacy was dismissed by a federal judge on Sunday. The Justice Department appealed that decision quickly.

Local residents described the FBI visits as professional but intrusive. Sharon Hunter, who donated $1,000 to the campaign, said the agents asked if she felt deceived. She expressed surprise at the federal attention paid to a local teacher who ran an after-school guitar program. Other donors, including retired fisherman Ed Wood and boat seller Charles Flint, said they supported Sullivan for reasons unrelated to national politics. Flint noted that Sullivan never explained his motives for entering the race, suggesting the teacher may have viewed himself as a spoiler rather than a serious contender.

The controversy has placed Petersburg, a community of 3,000 known as Little Norway, in the national spotlight. Residents have mixed feelings about the local figure at the center of the probe. Amanda Ohmer, a bartender, said she believed Sullivan was a liberal who attended anti-Trump protests. She supported the investigation, calling the tactic slezy. Ohmer noted, "Just because Republicans do it, too, doesn't make it right." The town has seen a surge in media attention, with locals joking about the situation at local events.

The Justice Department's probe into campaign finance violations continues as federal authorities gather testimony. Agents told donor Anna Holmes that they were investigating potential breaches of campaign finance rules. They also asked if the couple had intended to give money to the senator's campaign. Holmes said she told the agent she would not have done that. The inquiry remains active, with no final determination on charges yet announced.

Source: Alaska Star

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Headlines Post in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Headlines Post in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.